News and Research articles on Platforms

(Un)disclosed brand partnerships: How platform policies and interfaces shape commercial content for influencers

Taylor Annabell, Utrecht University
Laura Aade, University of Luxembourg
Catalina Goanta, Utrecht University
PUBLISHED ON: 15 Nov 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.4.1814

This paper analyses how platform policies and interfaces of TikTok, YouTube, Snap, and Instagram shape commercial content for influencers and the legal duty to disclose such content under European consumer law.

A mixed method study of the EU geo-block's effectiveness in limiting sharing of Russian propaganda media and content in the wake of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Value Sensitive Design and power in socio-technical ecosystems

Mattis Jacobs, Universität Hamburg
Christian Kurtz, Universität Hamburg
Judith Simon, Universität Hamburg
Tilo Böhmann, Universität Hamburg
PUBLISHED ON: 30 Sep 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1580

This paper investigates challenges arising for Value Sensitive Design due to the distribution of power in socio-technical ecosystems.

Platformisation in game development

Aleena Chia, Simon Fraser University
Brendan Keogh, Queensland University of Technology
Dale Leorke, Tampere University
Benjamin Nicoll, Queensland University of Technology
PUBLISHED ON: 21 Oct 2020 DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1515

This article draws on case studies of two software development platforms, Unity and Twine, to unpack how the game development process both adheres to and challenges understandings of ‘platformisation’.

Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates

Tarleton Gillespie, Microsoft Research
Patricia Aufderheide, American University
Elinor Carmi, University of Liverpool
Ysabel Gerrard, University of Sheffield
Robert Gorwa, University of Oxford
Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández, Queensland University of Technology
Sarah T. Roberts, University of California, Los Angeles
Aram Sinnreich, American University
Sarah Myers West, New York University
PUBLISHED ON: 21 Oct 2020 DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1512

Content moderation has exploded as a public and a policy concern, but the debate remains too narrow. Nine experts suggest ways to expand it.

Back up: can users sue platforms to reinstate deleted content?

Matthias C. Kettemann, Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut
Anna Sophia Tiedeke, Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut
PUBLISHED ON: 4 Jun 2020 DOI: 10.14763/2020.2.1484

Can platforms delete whatever content they want? Not everywhere, say the authors of this paper, which shows why certain social networks ‘must carry’ some content – and how users in some jurisdictions can force the companies to allow them into their communicative space.

Platform transience: changes in Facebook’s policies, procedures, and affordances in global electoral politics

Bridget Barrett, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Daniel Kreiss, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
PUBLISHED ON: 31 Dec 2019 DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1446

This paper shows how platforms are transient in the policies, procedures, and affordances and details the implications for politics.

Platformisation

Thomas Poell, University of Amsterdam
David Nieborg, University of Toronto
José van Dijck, Utrecht University
PUBLISHED ON: 29 Nov 2019 DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1425

What is platformisation? This article contextualises, defines, and operationalises the concept. Drawing insights from different scholarly perspectives on platforms it develops a comprehensive approach to this process.

Platform ad archives: promises and pitfalls

Paddy Leerssen, University of Amsterdam
Jef Ausloos, University of Amsterdam
Brahim Zarouali, University of Amsterdam
Natali Helberger, University of Amsterdam
Claes de Vreese, University of Amsterdam
PUBLISHED ON: 9 Oct 2019 DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1421

Ad archives are a novel tool in online advertising governance. They promise significant benefits, but only if their operators address key criticisms.

This paper analyses the aftermath of the advertiser revolt on YouTube to draw out the broader implications of the controversy as it relates to the algorithmic gatekeeping of culture. It argues that the event shows as never before that decisions about categorisation and classification of cultural content invariably affect the financial trajectory of the said content. It ends by calling for broader stakeholder participation within key decision-making processes of digital platforms.