News and Research articles on Social media

Regulating high-reach AI: On transparency directions in the Digital Services Act

Kasia Söderlund, Lund University
Emma Engström, Institute for Futures Studies
Kashyap Haresamudram, Lund University
Stefan Larsson, Lund University
Pontus Strimling, Institute for Futures Studies
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Mar 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.1.1746

Focusing on recommender systems used by dominant social media platforms as an example of high-reach AI, this study explores the directionality of transparency provisions introduced by the Digital Services Act and highlights the pivotal role of oversight authorities in addressing risks posed by high-reach AI technologies.

Banning children’s social media use: A wave of symbolic regulations, but at what cost?

Pascal Schneiders, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Alicia Gilbert, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

PUBLISHED ON: 13 Mar 2024

Recent public discourse on social media sounds somewhat dystopian: Facebook, TikTok, Instagram and co. knowingly use manipulative design features and algorithms to keep users hooked. Children and young people are particularly susceptible to this — staring at their screen for countless hours, they become addicted, depressed, and plagued by anxiety. Losing control over their own behaviour, they neglect other activities. A problem so serious that politicians need to intervene.

From brand safety to suitability: advertisers in platform governance

Rachel Griffin, Paris Institute of Political Studies
PUBLISHED ON: 11 Jul 2023 DOI: 10.14763/2023.3.1716

Advertisers’ concerns about “brand safety” and “brand suitability” are an underappreciated influence on social media platforms’ content governance, with concerning implications for social equality and the freedom of public debate online.

Information interventions and social media

Giovanni De Gregorio, University of Oxford
Nicole Stremlau, University of Oxford; University of Johannesburg
PUBLISHED ON: 30 Jun 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1567

The spread of hate speech and disinformation on social media has contributed to inflaming conflicts and mass atrocities as seen in Myanmar. Is the doctrine of information intervention a solution to escalations of violence?

Combating misinformation online: re-imagining social media for policy-making

Eleni A. Kyza, Cyprus University of Technology
Christiana Varda, Cyprus University of Technology
Dionysis Panos, Cyprus University of Technology
Melina Karageorgiou, Cyprus University of Technology
Nadejda Komendantova, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Serena Coppolino Perfumi, Stockholm University
Syed Iftikhar Husain Shah, International Hellenic University
Akram Sadat Hosseini, University of Stuttgart
PUBLISHED ON: 21 Oct 2020 DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1514

What more can social media platforms do to combat misinformation? Recommendations from policymakers suggest reconceptualising social media policies as a necessary step.

Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates

Tarleton Gillespie, Microsoft Research
Patricia Aufderheide, American University
Elinor Carmi, University of Liverpool
Ysabel Gerrard, University of Sheffield
Robert Gorwa, University of Oxford
Ariadna Matamoros-Fernández, Queensland University of Technology
Sarah T. Roberts, University of California, Los Angeles
Aram Sinnreich, American University
Sarah Myers West, New York University
PUBLISHED ON: 21 Oct 2020 DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1512

Content moderation has exploded as a public and a policy concern, but the debate remains too narrow. Nine experts suggest ways to expand it.

What if Facebook goes down? Ethical and legal considerations for the demise of big tech

Carl Öhman, University of Oxford
Nikita Aggarwal, University of Oxford
PUBLISHED ON: 11 Aug 2020 DOI: 10.14763/2020.3.1488

This paper examines the ethical and legal issues arising from the closure of a data-rich firms such as Facebook and provides four policy recommendations to mitigate the resulting harms to society.

WhatsApp and political instability in Brazil: targeted messages and political radicalisation

Rafael Evangelista, State University of Campinas (Unicamp)
Fernanda Bruno, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
PUBLISHED ON: 31 Dec 2019 DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1434

This paper analyses the spread of misinformation in the context of 2018 Brazilian elections. We give a general overview of the Brazilian political context, its media ecosystem and the weaponisation of the country’s most popular messaging app, WhatsApp, as a political persuasion tool. The current architecture of the platform does not allow, once appropriated for purposes of election campaigns, users to notice or become aware that they are being monitored and managed.

Filter bubble

Axel Bruns, Queensland University of Technology
PUBLISHED ON: 29 Nov 2019 DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1426

Concepts such as ‘filter bubble’ enjoy considerable popularity in scholarly as well as mainstream debates, but are rarely defined with any rigour. This has led to highly contradictory research findings. This article provides a critical review of the ‘filter bubble’ idea, and concludes that its persistence has served only to distract scholarly attention from far more critical areas of enquiry.

Reading between the lines and the numbers: an analysis of the first NetzDG reports

Amélie Heldt, Hans-Bredow-Institut
PUBLISHED ON: 12 Jun 2019 DOI: 10.14763/2019.2.1398

The German Network Enforcement Act is an attempt to counteract the effects of hate speech on social media platforms. This paper analyses and evaluates the reports on the handling of complaints about unlawful content after its coming into force.