News and Research articles on Blockchain

Accountability protocols? On-chain dynamics in blockchain governance

Kelsie Nabben, European University Institute
Primavera De Filippi, National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS)
PUBLISHED ON: 8 Oct 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.4.1807

This paper focuses on the dynamics of accountability in blockchain governance. Drawing on a case study of the Lido protocol on Ethereum, it explores the rule of code, on-chain accountability, accountability trade-offs, and the complexities of determining when accountability can be better instantiated via on-chain or off-chain mechanisms.

The unusual DAO: An ethnography of building trust in “trustless” spaces

Tara Merk, French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)/University of Paris II
PUBLISHED ON: 24 Sep 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.3.1795

This paper investigates decentralised autonomous organisations (DAOs) as a potential policy response to the issue of declining trust online and argues that while DAOs have privileged displacing the need for trust, they can also be designed to nourish trust thereby fostering participation and prosocial use cases.

Ad hoc network

Kelsie Nabben, RMIT University
Ellie Rennie, RMIT University
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1666

There is no one set definition for the phrase “ad hoc networks”. The term refers to the ability for members of a network to establish a network connection between devices. Yet, ad hoc networks pertain to both the technical domain of network infrastructures, the social, political and economic modes of self-organisation they enable, and the regulatory and policy settings that enable them.

Value Sensitive Design and power in socio-technical ecosystems

Mattis Jacobs, Universität Hamburg
Christian Kurtz, Universität Hamburg
Judith Simon, Universität Hamburg
Tilo Böhmann, Universität Hamburg
PUBLISHED ON: 30 Sep 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1580

This paper investigates challenges arising for Value Sensitive Design due to the distribution of power in socio-technical ecosystems.

Decentralisation in the blockchain space

Balázs Bodó, University of Amsterdam
Jaya Klara Brekke, Durham University
Jaap-Henk Hoepman, Radboud University
PUBLISHED ON: 19 May 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1560

The rapidly evolving blockchain technology space has put decentralisation back into the focus of the design of techno-social systems, and the role of decentralised technological infrastructures in achieving particular social, economic, or political goals. In this entry we address how blockchains and distributed ledgers think about decentralisation.

Trust in blockchain-based systems

Moritz Becker, Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society
Balázs Bodó, University of Amsterdam
PUBLISHED ON: 20 Apr 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1555

Trust can best be understood as a relational attribute between (1) a social actor and other actor(s) (interpersonal trust) and / or (2) actors and institutions (institutional or systemic trust) and (3) institutions and (trusting) actors (trust as shared expectations), where institutional frameworks define the nature and strength of trust relationships between different actors.

KEYWORDS: Trust, Blockchain

Mining

Wassim Zuhair Alsindi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Laura Lotti, Independent
PUBLISHED ON: 20 Apr 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1551

In the context of blockchain networks, mining describes a permissionless process intended to ensure the global consistency of a decentralised ledger. Mining requires the consumption of a costly computational resource to participate in a probabilistic competition that confers specific privileges to a node. These privileges typically relate to the proposal of a new block, including the identity and order of transactions contained within. Mining is incentivised via an algorithmically regulated provision of rewards, usually in the form of newly generated coins and/or transaction fees.

KEYWORDS: Blockchain

The invisible politics of Bitcoin: governance crisis of a decentralised infrastructure

Primavera De Filippi, Harvard University
Benjamin Loveluck, Télécom ParisTech (Université Paris-Saclay) and CERSA (CNRS-Paris 2)
PUBLISHED ON: 30 Sep 2016 DOI: 10.14763/2016.3.427

A trustless technology, Bitcoin tries to solve issues of social coordination and economic exchange by relying exclusively on technological means. Is technology alone able to resolve the social and political concerns affecting the Bitcoin network?