Uploaders' perceptions of the German implementation of the EU copyright reform and their preferences for copyright regulation

Steliyana Doseva, Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation
Hannah Schmid-Petri, University of Passau
Jan Schillmöller, Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation
Dirk Heckmann, Technical University of Munich
PUBLISHED ON: 14 Dec 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.4.1674

While the upload filters introduced by the EU copyright reform are being transposed into national law, this study examines how uploaders perceive copyright regulation and what further demands they have.

Ad hoc network

Kelsie Nabben, RMIT University
Ellie Rennie, RMIT University
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1666

There is no one set definition for the phrase “ad hoc networks”. The term refers to the ability for members of a network to establish a network connection between devices. Yet, ad hoc networks pertain to both the technical domain of network infrastructures, the social, political and economic modes of self-organisation they enable, and the regulatory and policy settings that enable them.

Cypherpunk

André Ramiro, Law and Technology Research Institute of Recife (IP.rec)
Ruy de Queiroz, Federal University of Pernambuco
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1664

Cypherpunk refers to social movements, individuals, institutions, technologies, and political actions that, with a decentralised approach, defend, support, offer, code, or rely on strong encryption systems in order to re-shape social, political, or economic asymmetries. ​

Non-user

Selwa Sweidan, University of Southern California
Karlynne Ejercito, University of Southern California
PUBLISHED ON: 21 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1663

A “non-user,” as the name suggests, refers to an individual who does not use a given product or system. Critical work on non-use elaborates a range of applications for the term we consider here. The variations of non-use under discussion encompass both voluntary and involuntary cases of non-use.

Digitally-disadvantaged languages

Isabelle A. Zaugg, Columbia University
Anushah Hossain, University of California Berkeley
Brendan Molloy, Independent researcher
PUBLISHED ON: 11 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1654

Digitally-disadvantaged languages face multiple inequities in the digital sphere, with their speaker communities frequently experiencing the duality of digital neglect and surveillance. These languages suffer from gaps in digital support, and when support does exist, it often makes speaker communities vulnerable to surveillance and gaps in content moderation.