Glossary

A special section of Internet Policy Review, the "Glossary of decentralised technosocial systems" is an interdisciplinary glossary on peer-to-peer, user-centric and privacy-enhancing decentralised technologies. In order to tackle the existing gap in shared semantics, this glossary converges the efforts of experts from various disciplines to build a shared vocabulary on the social, technical, economic, political aspects of decentralised, distributed or sovereign technologies.

Read the editorial introducing the special section here:

Introducing the glossary of decentralised technosocial systems

Valeria Ferrari, University of Amsterdam

Ad hoc network

Kelsie Nabben, RMIT University
Ellie Rennie, RMIT University
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1666

There is no one set definition for the phrase “ad hoc networks”. The term refers to the ability for members of a network to establish a network connection between devices. Yet, ad hoc networks pertain to both the technical domain of network infrastructures, the social, political and economic modes of self-organisation they enable, and the regulatory and policy settings that enable them.

Cryptocurrency

Ingolf G. A. Pernice, Weizenbaum Institute
Brett Scott, Independent
PUBLISHED ON: 20 May 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1561

A cryptocurrency system can be understood as a system intended for the issuance of tokens which are intended to be used as a general or limited-purpose medium-of-exchange, and which are accounted for using an often collectively-maintained digital ledger making use of cryptography to replace trust in institutions to varying extents. Against such a backdrop, the singular term cryptocurrency can mean a token, intended to be used as a general or limited-purpose medium-of-exchange, issued via a cryptocurrency system.

KEYWORDS: Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin

Cypherpunk

André Ramiro, Law and Technology Research Institute of Recife (IP.rec)
Ruy de Queiroz, Federal University of Pernambuco
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1664

Cypherpunk refers to social movements, individuals, institutions, technologies, and political actions that, with a decentralised approach, defend, support, offer, code, or rely on strong encryption systems in order to re-shape social, political, or economic asymmetries. ​

Data commons

Gijs van Maanen, Tilburg University
Charlotte Ducuing, KU Leuven
Tommaso Fia, University of Tübingen
PUBLISHED ON: 4 Apr 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.2.1748

Data commons are more than data sharing arrangements. They bring up issues relating to the kind of communities they uphold, their relationships with third parties (such as other commons), data capitalism, and various dimensions of sustainability.

Decentralisation in the blockchain space

Balázs Bodó, University of Amsterdam
Jaya Klara Brekke, Durham University
Jaap-Henk Hoepman, Radboud University
PUBLISHED ON: 19 May 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1560

The rapidly evolving blockchain technology space has put decentralisation back into the focus of the design of techno-social systems, and the role of decentralised technological infrastructures in achieving particular social, economic, or political goals. In this entry we address how blockchains and distributed ledgers think about decentralisation.

Decentralised content moderation

Paul Friedl, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Julian Morgan, Humboldt Universität Berlin
PUBLISHED ON: 4 Apr 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.2.1754

Decentralised content moderation describes and potentially advocates for moderation infrastructures in which both the authority and the responsibility to moderate are distributed over a plurality of actors or institutions.

Digitally-disadvantaged languages

Isabelle A. Zaugg, Columbia University
Anushah Hossain, University of California Berkeley
Brendan Molloy, Independent researcher
PUBLISHED ON: 11 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1654

Digitally-disadvantaged languages face multiple inequities in the digital sphere, with their speaker communities frequently experiencing the duality of digital neglect and surveillance. These languages suffer from gaps in digital support, and when support does exist, it often makes speaker communities vulnerable to surveillance and gaps in content moderation.

Mining

Wassim Zuhair Alsindi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Laura Lotti, Independent
PUBLISHED ON: 20 Apr 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1551

In the context of blockchain networks, mining describes a permissionless process intended to ensure the global consistency of a decentralised ledger. Mining requires the consumption of a costly computational resource to participate in a probabilistic competition that confers specific privileges to a node. These privileges typically relate to the proposal of a new block, including the identity and order of transactions contained within. Mining is incentivised via an algorithmically regulated provision of rewards, usually in the form of newly generated coins and/or transaction fees.

KEYWORDS: Blockchain

Non-user

Selwa Sweidan, University of Southern California
Karlynne Ejercito, University of Southern California
PUBLISHED ON: 21 Apr 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.2.1663

A “non-user,” as the name suggests, refers to an individual who does not use a given product or system. Critical work on non-use elaborates a range of applications for the term we consider here. The variations of non-use under discussion encompass both voluntary and involuntary cases of non-use.

Openness

Tyng-Ruey Chuang, Academia Sinica
Rebecca C. Fan, Academia Sinica
Ming-Syuan Ho, Academia Sinica
Kalpana Tyagi, Maastricht University
PUBLISHED ON: 30 Mar 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.1.1643

Openness is contextual. Open implies access to resources or participatory mode of production that can be otherwise closed or restricted in degrees. Openness does not necessarily lead to inclusiveness or equity, even though it may be used to invoke such ideals.

Self-sovereign identity

Alexandra Giannopoulou, University of Amsterdam
Fennie Wang, Dionysus Labs
PUBLISHED ON: 20 Apr 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1550

The concept of self-sovereign identity (SSI) describes an identity management system created to operate independently of third-party public or private actors, based on decentralised technological architectures, and designed to prioritise user security, privacy, individual autonomy and self-empowerment.

KEYWORDS: Identity

Traceability

Nanna Bonde Thylstrup, Copenhagen Business School
Matthew Archer, Graduate Institute for International and Development Studies
Louis Ravn, Copenhagen Business School
PUBLISHED ON: 30 Mar 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.1.1646

This glossary entry explores traceability which is an increasingly prominent research topic in decentralised technosocial systems in fields as diverse as health, sustainability, finance, and supply chain management and relates to the ability to trace something or someone.

Trust in blockchain-based systems

Moritz Becker, Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society
Balázs Bodó, University of Amsterdam
PUBLISHED ON: 20 Apr 2021 DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1555

Trust can best be understood as a relational attribute between (1) a social actor and other actor(s) (interpersonal trust) and / or (2) actors and institutions (institutional or systemic trust) and (3) institutions and (trusting) actors (trust as shared expectations), where institutional frameworks define the nature and strength of trust relationships between different actors.

KEYWORDS: Trust, Blockchain

Web monetisation

Catalina Goanta, Utrecht University
Alfa Yohanis, University of York
Vikas Jaiman, Maastricht University
Visara Urovi, Maastricht University
PUBLISHED ON: 31 Mar 2022 DOI: 10.14763/2022.1.1650

Web monetisation is the conversion of user traffic into revenue. This glossary entry provides an overview of the concepts of web and content monetisation, discusses aspects arising out of their interaction, and addresses three main issues currently associated with the term: the interoperability of social media infrastructures, the interoperability of content and web monetisation, and the moderation of content monetised decentrally.