Research articles on GOVERNANCE

This introduction explores how the evolution of the metaverse as an additional virtual public sphere challenges existing governance frameworks, and demonstrates the need for a comprehensive multi-disciplinary approach to adapting and re-imagining these frameworks.

When the metaverse distributes authority across states, platforms, protocols, and communities simultaneously, the only viable response is a governance framework that allocates functions across all four layers rather than insisting, against the evidence, that any single actor holds the reins.

This paper explores whether the EU’s platform governance framework, designed for non-immersive social media platforms, is fit to safeguard copyright’s fair balance and promote robust democratic discourse in immersive virtual public spaces.

How do India and the EU regulate metaverse interoperability? This paper offers a side-by-side legal analysis with practical policy mandates.

Superhighway to serfdom: The political economy of the metaverse

Tom Mamer, Onofhängege Gewerkschaftsbond Lëtzebuerg (OGBL)
Annette Freyberg-Inan, University of Amsterdam
PUBLISHED ON: 24 Sep 2026 DOI: 10.14763/2026.3.2113

Plans for the metaverse are threatening to move us out of market capitalism into a technofeudal order – liberal market governance is no longer a sufficient regulatory response.

The article shows how EU regulatory approaches to AI align with Silicon Valley technosolutionist imaginaries.

Freedom of the media

Andrei Richter, Comenius University
Krisztina Rozgonyi, Austrian Academy of Sciences
Joan Barata Mir, Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Monroe E. Price, University of Pennsylvania
PUBLISHED ON: 18 Jun 2026 DOI: 10.14763/2026.2.2103

Freedom of the media must evolve beyond institutional protection to safeguard citizens’ epistemic agency in digital societies where platforms and AI systems shape what we know and how we participate in democracy.

This article explores how political fear operates as an infrastructural mechanism within digital platforms, reconfiguring democratic communication through algorithmic amplification, emotional governance, and regulatory gaps.

Who’s behind the wheel? Assessing internet regulatory agencies’ autonomy from corporate interests

Elise Antoine, London School of Economics & Political Science
PUBLISHED ON: 6 Mar 2026 DOI: 10.14763/2026.1.2088

This paper examines which combinations of factors contribute to internet regulatory agencies' informal autonomy from corporate interests, building on a qualitative comparative analysis and interviews with senior officials.

Between search and platform: ChatGPT under the DSA

Toni Lorente, The Future Society
Kathrin Gardhouse, The Future Society
PUBLISHED ON: 17 Feb 2026 DOI: 10.14763/2026.1.2084

This article examines the applicability of the Digital Services Act (DSA) to ChatGPT, arguing that it should be classified as a hybrid of the two types of hosting services: online search engines and platforms.