What does a recent decision by the European Union’s Court of Justice – ruling that IAB Europe is liable under the GDPR for a technical standard it wrote – mean for internet standard-setting organisations?

Facebook, the EU and Russia’s war: Challenges of moderating authoritarian news

Julia Kling, University of Passau
Serge Poliakoff, University of Amsterdam
PUBLISHED ON: 11 Sep 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.3.2036

Despite several measures to curb their visibility, this study shows how Facebook mediates predominantly Russian state-aligned news during Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine

Who’s at stake? The (non)performativity of “stakeholders” in UK tech policy

Maisy Taylor, University of York
Sarah Vollmer, University of Utrecht
Zaynab Ravat, Solent University
Garfield Benjamin, University of Cambridge
PUBLISHED ON: 4 Sep 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.3.2033

Tech policy often makes appeals to the interests of stakeholders, but in this study we show the different forms of power that are performed through the use of this term in UK tech policy.

How the new digital knowledge order is impacting science

Donya Alinejad, Utrecht University
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Aug 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.3.2031

To develop a response to what the new digital knowledge order means for science and scholarship, we need research and policy that focuses on the multiple ways platform power shapes academic knowledge production and communication.

This paper examines how governmental decision-making was undertaken in the aftermath of four key cybersecurity crises affecting Estonian e-governance, with the objective of bolstering future cybersecurity.

‘Cookie-less’ identification for/against privacy?

Ido Sivan-Sevilla, University of Maryland
Patrick Parham, University of Maryland
Lee McGuigan, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
PUBLISHED ON: 6 Aug 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.3.2025

The online advertising industry is shifting content monetisation mechanisms to rely on first-party user identification architectures. The paper evaluates these architectures based on a novel typology to assess their privacy implications.

The impact of zero-knowledge proofs on data minimisation compliance of digital identity wallets

Emanuela Podda, Università degli Studi di Milano
Pol Hölzmer, University of Luxembourg
Alexandre Amard, University of Luxembourg
Johannes Sedlmeir, University of Münster
Gilbert Fridgen, University of Luxembourg
PUBLISHED ON: 30 Jul 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.3.2019

Zero-knowledge proofs allow the implementation of the data minimisation principle imposed by the GDPR in digital identity wallets and the related personal data transactions, therefore representing a reasonable option to be enforced by lawmakers.

“You and TikTok are, and will remain at all times, independent contractors”

Taylor Annabell, Utrecht University
Sophie Bishop, University of Leeds
Catalina Goanta, Utrecht University
PUBLISHED ON: 23 Jul 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.3.2014

This article explores TikTok's platform governance of monetisation by systematically examining the classification of influencers and monetisation practices in TikTok’s platform documentation.