To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Spilker, H.S., & Reppen, M. (2026). Clash between law power and code power: The case of Norway vs. Meta. Internet Policy Review, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2026.1.2078

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Spilker, Hendrik Storstein and Reppen, Maria. 2026. "Clash between law power and code power: The case of Norway vs. Meta". Internet Policy Review 15 (1). DOI: 10.14763/2026.1.2078. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/between-law-power-and-code-power.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Spilker, Hendrik Storstein & Reppen, M. (2026). Clash between law power and code power: The case of Norway vs. Meta. Internet Policy Review,[online] 15(1). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/between-law-power-and-code-power [Accessed: 5 Sep. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Spilker, Hendrik Storstein, and Reppen, Maria. "Clash between law power and code power: The case of Norway vs. Meta". Internet Policy Review 15.1 (2026). Web. 5 Sep. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Spilker HS, Reppen M. Clash between law power and code power: The case of Norway vs. Meta. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2026 [5 September 2026];15(1). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/between-law-power-and-code-power

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Volume 13, Issue 4

Between the cracks: Blind spots in regulating media concentration and platform dependence in the EU

Theresa Josephine Seipp, University of Amsterdam
Natali Helberger, University of Amsterdam
Claes de Vreese, University of Amsterdam
Jef Ausloos, University of Amsterdam
PUBLISHED ON: 14 Nov 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.4.1813

The DSA, DMA, and EMFA aim to regulate platform power over digital services and markets while establishing rules to protect media freedom, pluralism, and editorial independence, notably through efforts to address media concentration; however, they seem to overlook some of the underlying causes driving these concentration threats.

KEYWORDS: Platform power, Media pluralism, European Media Freedom Act (EMFA), Digital media, Platform dependence

An analysis of platform lobbying and policy influence during the Digital Services Act negotiations in the EU.

KEYWORDS: Platform power, Lobbying, Business power, Policy influence, Platform governance

Volume 13, Issue 2

Introduction to the special issue on Locating and theorising platform power Locating and theorising platform power

David Nieborg, University of Toronto
Thomas Poell, University of Amsterdam
Robyn Caplan, Duke University
José van Dijck, Utrecht University
PUBLISHED ON: 26 Jun 2024 DOI: 10.14763/2024.2.1781

Against the backdrop of ongoing public and political debates about the power and regulation of large platform conglomerates, this special issue presents critical, conceptual, and empirical studies that home in on the various modalities of platform power.

KEYWORDS: Platform power, Governance, Infrastructure, Markets, Relational

This paper demonstrates how gig platforms can become both a resource for risk management and a new source of risk, depending on the complex interaction between a platform’s labour management strategies on the one hand and the mix of support structures and dependencies in a worker’s life on the other.

KEYWORDS: Platform power, Gig economy, Risk, Platform-adjacent approach, Everyday life

The paper contributes to the further development of platform studies by looking at the early stages of development. It draws on insights from an exemplary research and innovation project that aimed to develop a "diversity-aware online social platform".

KEYWORDS: Innovation, Platform power, Platform design, Big data, Algorithms

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing