To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

van Dijck, J., Nieborg, D., & Poell, T. (2019). Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

van Dijck, José, Nieborg, David and Poell, Thomas. 2019. "Reframing platform power". Internet Policy Review 8 (2). DOI: 10.14763/2019.2.1414. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/reframing-platform-power.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

van Dijck, José, Nieborg, D. & Poell, T. (2019). Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review,[online] 8(2). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/reframing-platform-power [Accessed: 9 Sep. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

van Dijck, José, Nieborg, David, and Poell, Thomas. "Reframing platform power". Internet Policy Review 8.2 (2019). Web. 9 Sep. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

van Dijck J, Nieborg D, Poell T. Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2019 [9 September 2026];8(2). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/reframing-platform-power

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Latin America's data centre boom reveals that digital sovereignty depends less on legal declarations than on states' operational control over energy, water, and exit rights.

Platforms’ lack of compliance with the Code of Practice on Disinformation shows that they are not doing enough to counter mis- and disinformation.

KEYWORDS: Disinformation, Platform regulation, Code of Practice on Disinformation, EU internet policy, VLOP

We investigate whether platform companies disrupt local regulations by analysing how cities respond to platform companies and the extent to which they concede to and accommodate them.

KEYWORDS: Platform power, Disruption, Platform regulation, Regulatory disruption, Cities

Drawing from 33 elite interviews, this study develops a capacity-based approach to analyse the emergent regulatory system for online safety in the UK.

KEYWORDS: Platform regulation, Platforms, United Kingdom, Online safety, Regulatory capacity

Advertisers’ concerns about “brand safety” and “brand suitability” are an underappreciated influence on social media platforms’ content governance, with concerning implications for social equality and the freedom of public debate online.

KEYWORDS: Platform governance, Social media, Platform regulation, Content regulation, Digital Service Act

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing