To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Akgül, M., & Kırlıdoğ, M. (2015). Internet censorship in Turkey. Internet Policy Review, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2015.2.366

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Akgül, Mustafa and Kırlıdoğ, Melih. 2015. "Internet censorship in Turkey". Internet Policy Review 4 (2). DOI: 10.14763/2015.2.366. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/internet-censorship-turkey.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Akgül, Mustafa & Kırlıdoğ, M. (2015). Internet censorship in Turkey. Internet Policy Review,[online] 4(2). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/internet-censorship-turkey [Accessed: 1 Oct. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Akgül, Mustafa, and Kırlıdoğ, Melih. "Internet censorship in Turkey". Internet Policy Review 4.2 (2015). Web. 1 Oct. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Akgül M, Kırlıdoğ M. Internet censorship in Turkey. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2015 [1 October 2026];4(2). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/internet-censorship-turkey

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Newly released data reveal how a no-compromise approach to AI-generated and other fictional sexual content depicting children has diverted resources away from prosecuting real child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

In the shadow of missiles and malware, the open internet becomes the first casualty of survival.

KEYWORDS: Internet shutdown, Digital sovereignty, Cyberwar, Censorship, Iran

This article analyses the role that informational architectures and infrastructures in federated social media platforms play in content moderation processes.

KEYWORDS: Federation, Content moderation, Censorship, Governance, secure messaging

A mixed method study of the EU geo-block's effectiveness in limiting sharing of Russian propaganda media and content in the wake of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

KEYWORDS: Censorship, Propaganda, Information war, Platforms, Russia

After the global euphoria about the internet's potentials for empowering individuals and supporting democracy, more realistic arguments have been put forward against this optimism. ¹ Indeed, we have been observing an ongoing fight between the autocratic government in Turkey and the Turkish people over using the internet for the last 10 years. It started with Law No. 5651 which was passed in 2007.

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Call for papers

Monetisation governance in the creator economy

Read the full call here

Additional indexing