To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Chen, K.-W. (2026). Exploring digital solidarity economy in false information management: A case study of Taiwan's Cofacts platform. Internet Policy Review, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2026.1.2074

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Chen, Kuan-Wei. 2026. "Exploring digital solidarity economy in false information management: A case study of Taiwan's Cofacts platform". Internet Policy Review 15 (1). DOI: 10.14763/2026.1.2074. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/false-information-management-case-study.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Chen, Kuan-Wei (2026). Exploring digital solidarity economy in false information management: A case study of Taiwan's Cofacts platform. Internet Policy Review,[online] 15(1). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/false-information-management-case-study [Accessed: 15 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Chen, Kuan-Wei. "Exploring digital solidarity economy in false information management: A case study of Taiwan's Cofacts platform". Internet Policy Review 15.1 (2026). Web. 15 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Chen K-W. Exploring digital solidarity economy in false information management: A case study of Taiwan's Cofacts platform. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2026 [15 August 2026];15(1). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/false-information-management-case-study

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

The Drivers Cooperative reveals how diverging stakeholders in platform cooperatives can fracture in their pursuit of developing these platforms.

KEYWORDS: Digital solidarity economies, Platform cooperativism, Ride-hailing, Multistakeholder, Platform infrastructures

Based on a digital-urban ethnography of two queer spaces in Hong Kong, this paper argues that material, affective, and cultural forms of reproductive work with digital platforms illuminate both the tensions and potentials of platformised solidarity economies.

KEYWORDS: Digital queer studies, Social reproduction, Digital solidarity economies, Hong Kong, Queer Asia

This study examines how a government-led mobility platform in South Korea, framed as a cooperative digital solidarity project, faltered due to socio-technical misalignments, opaque governance, and limited community control.

KEYWORDS: Collaborative governance, Platform cooperativism, Digital solidarity economies, Community ownership, Blockchain technology

This study examines the Lunch Bell project, a state-supported, women-centred meal delivery platform in Kerala, India, embodying a digital solidarity economy that promotes sustainability and addresses gender inequalities through its inclusive labour model.

KEYWORDS: Digital solidarity economies, Women's labour, State, gender, Platform design

This study demonstrates that digitalisation within Social and Solidarity Economy organisations reproduces the sexual division of labour, with men continuing to dominate both the more technical and specialised competences as well as the most technically oriented positions.

KEYWORDS: Digital solidarity economies, Gender justice, Sexual division of labour, Social and solidarity economy, Digital competences

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing