To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Andersdotter, A., & Olejnik, L. (2021). Policy strategies for value-based technology standards. Internet Policy Review, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1573

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Andersdotter, Amelia and Olejnik, Lukasz. 2021. "Policy strategies for value-based technology standards". Internet Policy Review 10 (3). DOI: 10.14763/2021.3.1573. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/policy-strategies-value-based-technology-standards.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Andersdotter, Amelia & Olejnik, L. (2021). Policy strategies for value-based technology standards. Internet Policy Review,[online] 10(3). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/policy-strategies-value-based-technology-standards [Accessed: 17 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Andersdotter, Amelia, and Olejnik, Lukasz. "Policy strategies for value-based technology standards". Internet Policy Review 10.3 (2021). Web. 17 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Andersdotter A, Olejnik L. Policy strategies for value-based technology standards. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2021 [17 August 2026];10(3). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/policy-strategies-value-based-technology-standards

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Despite its growing success and widespread adoption around the world, open banking (OB) struggles to present a coherent identity. Since OB is driven by various justifications, identifying the primary motivations behind regulatory initiatives is crucial for assessing whether the implemented features align with the intended policy objectives.

KEYWORDS: Open banking, FinTech, Standards, Data, Regulation

The AI Act will require high-risk AI systems to comply with harmonised technical standards, including for the protection of fundamental rights: what problems might arise when mixing technical standards and fundamental rights?

KEYWORDS: Artificial intelligence, AI Act, Standards, CE mark, Fundamental rights

This glossary entry presents a topology of interoperability layers and presents some of the key economic and socio-technical concerns faced by interoperable systems.

KEYWORDS: Interoperability, Sociotechnical ecosystems, Standards

Gender inequalities in digital labour platforms echo those in the traditional labour market.

KEYWORDS: Digital labour platforms, gender, Crowdworking, Inequality, Labour, Standards

In this article, we assess the effectiveness and impact of telecommunications transparency reports on government requests for information.

KEYWORDS: Standards, Transparency, Telecommunication

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing