To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Gillespie, T., Aufderheide, P., Carmi, E., Gerrard, Y., Gorwa, R., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Roberts, S.T., Sinnreich, A., & Myers West, S. (2020). Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates. Internet Policy Review, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1512

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Gillespie, Tarleton, Aufderheide, Patricia and Carmi, Elinor. 2020. "Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates". Internet Policy Review 9 (4). DOI: 10.14763/2020.4.1512. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/expanding-debate-about-content-moderation-scholarly-research-agendas-coming-policy.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Gillespie, Tarleton (2020). Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates. Internet Policy Review,[online] 9(4). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/expanding-debate-about-content-moderation-scholarly-research-agendas-coming-policy [Accessed: 26 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Gillespie, Tarleton. "Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates". Internet Policy Review 9.4 (2020). Web. 26 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Gillespie T, Aufderheide P, Carmi E, Gerrard Y, Gorwa R, Matamoros-Fernández A. Expanding the debate about content moderation: scholarly research agendas for the coming policy debates. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2020 [26 August 2026];9(4). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/expanding-debate-about-content-moderation-scholarly-research-agendas-coming-policy

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Newly released data reveal how a no-compromise approach to AI-generated and other fictional sexual content depicting children has diverted resources away from prosecuting real child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

This paper explores how the Digital Services Act’s Transparency Database enables platform observability, revealing critical insights into the practices of content moderation across the EU.

KEYWORDS: Digital Services Act (DSA), Platform governance, Platform observability, Transparency, Content moderation

Transparency and content moderation are becoming increasingly interconnected within legislation. It is time for tech companies to recognise this in the context of borderline terrorist and violent extremist content moderation.

KEYWORDS: Transparency, Content moderation, Borderline content, Extremism, Social media

Trusted flaggers under the DSA have sparked the public debate; this article explains how we can safeguard freedom of expression and enable trusted flaggers to effectively target illegal content.

KEYWORDS: Content moderation, Digital Service Act, Freedom of expression, Trusted flaggers

Volume 14, Issue 1

Aspirational platform governance: How creators legitimise content moderation through accusations of bias

Blake Hallinan, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
CJ Reynolds, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Yehonatan Kuperberg, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Omer Rothenstein, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
PUBLISHED ON: 31 Mar 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.1.1829

Although commercial social media platforms provide few formal channels for participation in platform governance, creators aspire to influence decisions and policies through expressive forms of civic engagement that ultimately legitimate platforms as arbiters of public discourse.

KEYWORDS: Algorithmic bias, Content moderation, Platform governance, Creators, React videos

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing