APA
Gille, M., Tropmann-Frick, M., & Schomacker, T. (2024). Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems. Internet Policy Review, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1797
American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org
Chicago
Gille, Michael, Tropmann-Frick, Marina and Schomacker, Thorben. 2024. "Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems". Internet Policy Review 13 (3). DOI: 10.14763/2024.3.1797. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/balancing-public-interest-fundamental-rights-and-innovation.
Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org
Harvard
Gille, Michael, Tropmann-Frick, M. & Schomacker, T. (2024). Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems. Internet Policy Review,[online] 13(3). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/balancing-public-interest-fundamental-rights-and-innovation [Accessed: 31 Aug. 2026].
Harvard Referencing Style
MLA
Gille, Michael, Tropmann-Frick, Marina, and Schomacker, Thorben. "Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems". Internet Policy Review 13.3 (2024). Web. 31 Aug. 2026.
Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html
Vancouver
Gille M, Tropmann-Frick M, Schomacker T. Balancing public interest, fundamental rights, and innovation: The EU’s governance model for non-high-risk AI systems. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2024 [31 August 2026];13(3). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/balancing-public-interest-fundamental-rights-and-innovation
Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf