To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Cartwright, M. (2020). Internationalising state power through the internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle. Internet Policy Review, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.3.1494

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Cartwright, Madison. 2020. "Internationalising state power through the internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle". Internet Policy Review 9 (3). DOI: 10.14763/2020.3.1494. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/internationalising-state-power-through-internet-google-huawei-and-geopolitical.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Cartwright, Madison (2020). Internationalising state power through the internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle. Internet Policy Review,[online] 9(3). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/internationalising-state-power-through-internet-google-huawei-and-geopolitical [Accessed: 23 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Cartwright, Madison. "Internationalising state power through the internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle". Internet Policy Review 9.3 (2020). Web. 23 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Cartwright M. Internationalising state power through the internet: Google, Huawei and geopolitical struggle. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2020 [23 August 2026];9(3). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/internationalising-state-power-through-internet-google-huawei-and-geopolitical

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Volume 14, Issue 4

Developing the Citizen Summit Method: Understanding citizens’ views on digital surveillance technologies

Sally Dibb, Manchester Metropolitan University
Kirstie Ball, University of St Andrews Business School
Sara Degli Esposti, Institute of Philosophy of the Spanish Research Council (CSIC)
PUBLISHED ON: 18 Nov 2025 DOI: 10.14763/2025.4.2045

This paper discusses how to turn citizen summits into a robust, replicable, and participatory mixed methods approach for studying public views on digital surveillance technologies and other areas of internet policy.

KEYWORDS: Mixed-methods, Citizen summit, Deliberative methods, Participatory methods, Surveillance

In this article, we analyse attempts to regulate and control TikTok through the lens of foreign interference and technological sovereignty in Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the European Union.

KEYWORDS: TikTok, Foreign interference, Digital sovereignty, Geopolitics, Surveillance

Over the past fifty years, surveillance practices once considered untenable due to their incompatibility with democratic rights and values have been rebranded as tolerable, neutral, or even desirable.

KEYWORDS: Profiling, Surveillance, Digitalisation, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Democracy

Volume 12, Issue 1

The grey-zones of public-private surveillance: Policy tendencies of facial recognition for public security in Brazilian cities

André Ramiro, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
Luã Cruz, State University of Campinas (Unicamp)
PUBLISHED ON: 31 Mar 2023 DOI: 10.14763/2023.1.1705

The article explores the regulatory “grey zones” in the deployment of facial recognition (FRT) in policing in Brazil, and the policy and civic responses to them.

KEYWORDS: Facial recognition software, Security, Surveillance, Privacy, Brazil

An analysis of the EU data protection legislation and the AI Act proposal to assess, in light of the principle of proportionality, whether or not law enforcement authorities should be prohibited from using these technologies in "real time".

KEYWORDS: Smart cities, Facial recognition software, Law enforcement, Surveillance, Fundamental rights, Human rights

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing