To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Latzer, M., & Festic, N. (2019). A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1415

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Latzer, Michael and Festic, Noemi. 2019. "A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life". Internet Policy Review 8 (2). DOI: 10.14763/2019.2.1415. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/guideline-understanding-and-measuring-algorithmic-governance-everyday-life.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Latzer, Michael & Festic, N. (2019). A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life. Internet Policy Review,[online] 8(2). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/guideline-understanding-and-measuring-algorithmic-governance-everyday-life [Accessed: 19 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Latzer, Michael, and Festic, Noemi. "A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life". Internet Policy Review 8.2 (2019). Web. 19 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Latzer M, Festic N. A guideline for understanding and measuring algorithmic governance in everyday life. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2019 [19 August 2026];8(2). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/guideline-understanding-and-measuring-algorithmic-governance-everyday-life

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Navigating the clash between digital sovereignty and openness, this op-ed dissects the TikTok controversy – examining privacy, national security, and constitutional challenges – while spotlighting Europe’s robust regulatory frameworks and calling for harmonised global governance.

Volume 12, Issue 2

From access and transparency to refusal: Three responses to algorithmic governance

Alexandra James, La Trobe University
Danielle Hynes, University of New South Wales
Andrew Whelan, University of Wollongong
Tanja Dreher, University of New South Wales
Justine Humphry, University of Sydney
PUBLISHED ON: 17 May 2023 DOI: 10.14763/2023.2.1691

This paper critically engages with key responses to algorithmic governance, including access and inclusion, transparency, and refusal. How can these responses effectively address the harms produced by algorithmic governance?

KEYWORDS: Algorithmic governance, Data justice, Critical Data Studies, Data governance, Algorithmic accountability

This special issue brings together scholars from a range of disciplines to identify the human rights implications of algorithmic, biometric and smart city technologies and the means to govern them. In the editorial, we propose a framework for the analysis and design of human-rights-based smart cities.

KEYWORDS: Smart cities, Governance, Biometric, Algorithmic governance, Human rights

Feel like living in a dystopia? Take a deep breath, get a strong coffee, and let us challenge your ideas of where reality ends, and sci-fi begins…

KEYWORDS: Sci-fi, Information law, Artificial intelligence, Robotics, Algorithmic governance

Algorithmic governance as a key concept in controversies around the emerging digital society takes up the idea that digital technologies produce social ordering in a specific way.

KEYWORDS: Transparency, Automation, Politicisation, Regulation, Social ordering, Governance, Predictive policing, Content moderation, Algorithmic governance

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing