This paper examines the contradictory legal geographies that domestic courts currently negotiate when dealing with online and transnational child luring.
Filtered results
This paper is part of Geopolitics, jurisdiction and surveillance , a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Monique Mann and Angela Daly. Introduction Since the Snowden revelations in 2013 (see e.g., Lyon, 2014; Lyon, 2015) an ongoing policy issue has been the legitimate scope of surveillance, and the extent to which individuals
This paper examines data and privacy governance by four China-based mobile applications and their international versions - including the role of the state. It also highlights the role of platforms in gatekeeping mobile app privacy standards.
Focusing on whether data-intensive technologies used in political campaigning are accurate and effective misses the point about their larger role in politics. This piece briefly addresses the popular question of “Does it work?” and suggests a series of questions and provocations that aim to more holistically capture the extent of tech-led
Ad archives are a novel tool in online advertising governance. They promise significant benefits, but only if their operators address key criticisms.
Net neutrality consultations that tap into networked publics rest on a thin version of participation that maintains existing inequality.
Is reforming copyright law the appropriate solution to achieve the aims of the music industry?
Virtual technologies make it possible for private individuals to compete with traditional taxis. How does this affect society and welfare?
Agribusinesses are buying into big data for its predictive powers, bypassing farmers and aggregating previously proprietary farming data. Given this power asymmetry, what are the ethics of the use of big data in big agriculture?
In the last two decades, the industry has deployed endlessly the rhetoric of the “digital threat” in order to demand harsher measures against digital piracy. This paper shows that the “digital threat” discourse is based on shaky grounds.
