To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Eggenschwiler, J. (2017). Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance. Internet Policy Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.3.712

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Eggenschwiler, Jacqueline. 2017. "Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance". Internet Policy Review 6 (3). DOI: 10.14763/2017.3.712. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/accountability-challenges-confronting-cyberspace-governance.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Eggenschwiler, Jacqueline (2017). Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance. Internet Policy Review,[online] 6(3). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/accountability-challenges-confronting-cyberspace-governance [Accessed: 4 Sep. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Eggenschwiler, Jacqueline. "Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance". Internet Policy Review 6.3 (2017). Web. 4 Sep. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Eggenschwiler J. Accountability challenges confronting cyberspace governance. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2017 [4 September 2026];6(3). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/accountability-challenges-confronting-cyberspace-governance

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Iceland, the land of ice and fire, is a country of contrasts and rare challenges that foster interesting internet policy perspectives.

On 16 March 2023 the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and the State Council formally released the plan on reforming Party and state institutions which was endorsed during the annual National People’s Congress in early March.

Introduction

This paper explores how four approaches to cyber security are constructed, motivated and justified by different values such as privacy, economic order and national security and what this means for the actors involved.

KEYWORDS: Cyber security, Securitisation, Internet governance, Ethics, Values, Computer Ethics

In recent years, a myriad of “defensive measures” were implemented by Russia to tighten state control over the internet. Recent laws passed by the State Duma are likely to bring Russia's internet under firm government control.

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing