To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Malcolm, J. (2015). Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance. Internet Policy Review, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2015.4.391

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Malcolm, Jeremy. 2015. "Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance". Internet Policy Review 4 (4). DOI: 10.14763/2015.4.391. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/criteria-meaningful-stakeholder-inclusion-internet-governance.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Malcolm, Jeremy (2015). Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance. Internet Policy Review,[online] 4(4). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/criteria-meaningful-stakeholder-inclusion-internet-governance [Accessed: 1 Oct. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Malcolm, Jeremy. "Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance". Internet Policy Review 4.4 (2015). Web. 1 Oct. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Malcolm J. Criteria of meaningful stakeholder inclusion in internet governance. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2015 [1 October 2026];4(4). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/criteria-meaningful-stakeholder-inclusion-internet-governance

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

This paper discusses resolution of the contested meanings of inclusiveness, accountability and transparency in trade policymaking.

KEYWORDS: Trade, Internet governance, Civil society, Transparency, Multi-stakeholderism

Europe's regional internet governance meeting takes place between April's highly debated NetMundial in Brasil and the September's Internet Governance Forum in Turkey. Will the German organisers be able to make the link?

The NETmundial conference on internet governance was heralded as a success. But in civil society, assessments have been more nuanced.

In an ambitious move, the Brazilian government, technical and civil society organised a meeting to address key issues of internet governance. While not everybody was happy with the final result, process-wise it was a landmark meeting.

The dominant narrative about the governance of the internet in media and with high-level policymakers is misleading. Researchers Francesca Musiani and Julia Pohle explain what stands in the way of genuine multistakeholder internet governance as all eyes are turning towards Brazil and its NETmundial meeting.

KEYWORDS: Internet governance, Multi-stakeholderism, Net Mundial, Digital Cold War, United States of America

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Big tech in global security governance

Additional indexing