Bloggers' and online journalists’ experiences of defamation and privacy law suggest that new approaches to legal policy are needed in a digital media environment. This paper by Judith Townend draws on empirical research to analyse chilling effects in the UK.
Narrow down on Keyword
- Chilling effect (1) Apply Chilling effect filter
- Defamation (1) Apply Defamation filter
- Freedom of expression (1) Apply Freedom of expression filter
- Hyperlocal (1) Apply Hyperlocal filter
- Journalism (1) Apply Journalism filter
- Privacy (1) Apply Privacy filter
- Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP) (1) Apply Strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP) filter
Actors
- (-) Remove Bureau of Investigative Journalism filter Bureau of Investigative Journalism
- Bloggers (1) Apply Bloggers filter
- Heather Brooke (1) Apply Heather Brooke filter
- HelpMeInvestigate (1) Apply HelpMeInvestigate filter
- Journalists (1) Apply Journalists filter
- Media and Sport (1) Apply Media and Sport filter
- UK Department of Culture (1) Apply UK Department of Culture filter
Scope
Stakeholder
- (-) Remove Media filter Media
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER