With widespread smart contract implementation on the horizon, there is much conversation about how to regulate this new technology. Noting the failure of contract law to address the inequities of standardised contracts in the digital environment can help prevent them from being codified further into smart contracts.
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- Cambridge Analytica (1) Apply Cambridge Analytica filter
- Dynamic Coalition on Platform Responsibility (DCPR) (1) Apply Dynamic Coalition on Platform Responsibility (DCPR) filter
- Ethereum (1) Apply Ethereum filter
- European Union (1) Apply European Union filter
- Facebook (1) Apply Facebook filter
- International Standards Organization (ISO) (1) Apply International Standards Organization (ISO) filter
- Internet Governance Forum (IGF) (1) Apply Internet Governance Forum (IGF) filter
- United Kingdom (1) Apply United Kingdom filter
Stakeholder
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER