While intermediary liability is becoming an issue of increasing importance in internet governance discussions, little is being made at the institutional level to minimise conflicts across jurisdictions and ensure the compliance of intermediary liability laws with fundamental rights and the freedom to innovate.
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) filter African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR)
- Brazil (1) Apply Brazil filter
- Center for Technology and Society of the Law School at the Fundação Getúlio Vargas (CTS/FGV) (1) Apply Center for Technology and Society of the Law School at the Fundação Getúlio Vargas (CTS/FGV) filter
- Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (1) Apply Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime filter
- European Union (1) Apply European Union filter
- Global Conference on Cyberspace (GCC) (1) Apply Global Conference on Cyberspace (GCC) filter
- Global Multistakeholder Meeting on Internet Governance (NETmundial) (1) Apply Global Multistakeholder Meeting on Internet Governance (NETmundial) filter
- Human Rights Council (HRC) (1) Apply Human Rights Council (HRC) filter
- Interamerican Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) (1) Apply Interamerican Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) filter
- International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (1) Apply International Telecommunication Union (ITU) filter
- Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) (1) Apply Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) filter
- Japan (1) Apply Japan filter
- Ofcom (1) Apply Ofcom filter
- Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) (1) Apply Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) filter
- Organization of American States (1) Apply Organization of American States filter
- Rede Globo (1) Apply Rede Globo filter
- Russia (1) Apply Russia filter
- South Korea (1) Apply South Korea filter
- United Nations (UN) (1) Apply United Nations (UN) filter
- World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) (1) Apply World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) filter
- World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) (1) Apply World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) filter
Stakeholder
- (-) Remove Governmental filter Governmental
- (-) Remove Internet intermediaries filter Internet intermediaries
- Business (1) Apply Business filter
- Inter-governmental (1) Apply Inter-governmental filter
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER