Facing fragmentation of digital space in the Snowden aftermath, this article considers regulatory models available to avoid the balkanisation of the internet.
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove Google filter Google
- Australia (1) Apply Australia filter
- China (1) Apply China filter
- Council of Europe (CoE) (1) Apply Council of Europe (CoE) filter
- Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (1) Apply Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) filter
- Edward Snowden (1) Apply Edward Snowden filter
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (1) Apply Electronic Frontier Foundation filter
- European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (1) Apply European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) filter
- European Union (EU) (1) Apply European Union (EU) filter
- Germany (1) Apply Germany filter
- International Telecommunication Union (ITU) (1) Apply International Telecommunication Union (ITU) filter
- Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) (1) Apply Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) filter
- Internet Governance Forum (IGF) (1) Apply Internet Governance Forum (IGF) filter
- Microsoft (1) Apply Microsoft filter
- Microsoft Ireland (1) Apply Microsoft Ireland filter
- North Korea (1) Apply North Korea filter
- Russia (1) Apply Russia filter
- South Africa (1) Apply South Africa filter
- Stiftung Neue Verantwortung (1) Apply Stiftung Neue Verantwortung filter
- Thailand (1) Apply Thailand filter
- United Kingdom (1) Apply United Kingdom filter
- United Nations (UN) (1) Apply United Nations (UN) filter
- United Nations Human Rights Council (1) Apply United Nations Human Rights Council filter
- United States Congress (1) Apply United States Congress filter
- United States Pentagon (1) Apply United States Pentagon filter
- US National Security Agency (NSA) (1) Apply US National Security Agency (NSA) filter
Scope
- (-) Remove European Union filter European Union
- (-) Remove Western democracies filter Western democracies
Stakeholder
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER