This paper compares two controversies in social media governance and argues that social media companies’ actions indicate an expanded role for marketing and advertising as arbiters of the public interest in media content delivery.
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove Google filter Google
- (-) Remove Procter & Gamble filter Procter & Gamble
- Association for Progressive Communications (APC) (1) Apply Association for Progressive Communications (APC) filter
- AT&T (1) Apply AT&T filter
- Facebook (1) Apply Facebook filter
- Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) (1) Apply Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) filter
- Internet Research Agency (IRA) (1) Apply Internet Research Agency (IRA) filter
- Twitter (1) Apply Twitter filter
- United States Senate (1) Apply United States Senate filter
- YouTube (1) Apply YouTube filter
Scope
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER