How has policy reacted to the post-Snowden surveillance discourse in the UK? This paper identifies eight dynamics.
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove Edward Snowden filter Edward Snowden
- (-) Remove The Guardian filter The Guardian
- Amnesty International (1) Apply Amnesty International filter
- Apple (1) Apply Apple filter
- Article 19 (1) Apply Article 19 filter
- Big Brother Watch (1) Apply Big Brother Watch filter
- British General Headquarter of Communications (GCHQ) (1) Apply British General Headquarter of Communications (GCHQ) filter
- British Government (1) Apply British Government filter
- Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (1) Apply Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) filter
- David Anderson Q.C. (1) Apply David Anderson Q.C. filter
- David Cameron (1) Apply David Cameron filter
- European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) (1) Apply European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) filter
- European Court of Justice (ECJ) (1) Apply European Court of Justice (ECJ) filter
- Facebook (1) Apply Facebook filter
- Frank William La Rue (1) Apply Frank William La Rue filter
- Google (1) Apply Google filter
- Human Rights Council (HRC) (1) Apply Human Rights Council (HRC) filter
- Human Rights Watch (1) Apply Human Rights Watch filter
- Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) (1) Apply Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) filter
- Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) (1) Apply Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) filter
- Liberty Global (1) Apply Liberty Global filter
- Microsoft (1) Apply Microsoft filter
- Open Rights Group (1) Apply Open Rights Group filter
- Privacy International (1) Apply Privacy International filter
- Robert Hannigan (1) Apply Robert Hannigan filter
- Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) (1) Apply Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) filter
- UK Conservative Party (1) Apply UK Conservative Party filter
- UK Home Office (1) Apply UK Home Office filter
- UK Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament (1) Apply UK Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament filter
- UK Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) (1) Apply UK Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) filter
- UK Liberal Democrats (1) Apply UK Liberal Democrats filter
- UK Parliament (1) Apply UK Parliament filter
- UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Opinion (1) Apply UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Opinion filter
- United Nations (UN) (1) Apply United Nations (UN) filter
- United Nations General Assembly (1) Apply United Nations General Assembly filter
- US National Institute of Standards (NIST) (1) Apply US National Institute of Standards (NIST) filter
- US National Security Agency (NSA) (1) Apply US National Security Agency (NSA) filter
- World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (1) Apply World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) filter
Scope
- (-) Remove United Kingdom filter United Kingdom
Stakeholder
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER