There are significant dangers in surveilling online communications unless the mechanisms and policies of surveillance are subject to strict and legally enforceable standards of transparency, oversight, and control.
Narrow down on Keyword
- (-) Remove Transparency filter Transparency
- Base rate fallacy (1) Apply Base rate fallacy filter
- Bundestrojaner (1) Apply Bundestrojaner filter
- Censorship (1) Apply Censorship filter
- Communications data (1) Apply Communications data filter
- Content (1) Apply Content filter
- Content data (1) Apply Content data filter
- Cyber security (1) Apply Cyber security filter
- Encryption (1) Apply Encryption filter
- Filtering (1) Apply Filtering filter
- Fundamental principles (1) Apply Fundamental principles filter
- Intelligence services (1) Apply Intelligence services filter
- Interception (1) Apply Interception filter
- Liability (1) Apply Liability filter
- National Security Agency (NSA) (1) Apply National Security Agency (NSA) filter
- Predictive algorithms (1) Apply Predictive algorithms filter
- PRISM (1) Apply PRISM filter
- Privacy (1) Apply Privacy filter
- Security (1) Apply Security filter
- Surveillance (1) Apply Surveillance filter
- Tempora (1) Apply Tempora filter
Actors
- (-) Remove British Government filter British Government
- Chaos Computer Club (1) Apply Chaos Computer Club filter
- Citizen (1) Apply Citizen filter
- European Parlament (1) Apply European Parlament filter
- Facebook (1) Apply Facebook filter
- French Government (1) Apply French Government filter
- German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) (1) Apply German Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) filter
- German government (1) Apply German government filter
- Google (1) Apply Google filter
- Government of The Netherlands (1) Apply Government of The Netherlands filter
- Internet Service Provider (1) Apply Internet Service Provider filter
- U.S. Government (1) Apply U.S. Government filter
Scope
Stakeholder
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER