Datafication (the quantification of social life) is a colonial move which perpetuates a legacy of appropriation. But how to regulate this?
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove AirBNB filter AirBNB
- (-) Remove Google filter Google
- (-) Remove Netflix filter Netflix
- Acxiom (1) Apply Acxiom filter
- Alibaba Group (1) Apply Alibaba Group filter
- Amazon (1) Apply Amazon filter
- Apple (1) Apply Apple filter
- Axon (1) Apply Axon filter
- Baidu (1) Apply Baidu filter
- Didi (1) Apply Didi filter
- Facebook (1) Apply Facebook filter
- International Business Machines (IBM) (1) Apply International Business Machines (IBM) filter
- Microsoft (1) Apply Microsoft filter
- Palantir (1) Apply Palantir filter
- Samsung (1) Apply Samsung filter
- Spotify (1) Apply Spotify filter
- TalkingData (1) Apply TalkingData filter
- Tencent (1) Apply Tencent filter
- Uber (1) Apply Uber filter
- United Nations (UN) (1) Apply United Nations (UN) filter
- WeChat (1) Apply WeChat filter
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER