Agribusinesses are buying into big data for its predictive powers, bypassing farmers and aggregating previously proprietary farming data. Given this power asymmetry, what are the ethics of the use of big data in big agriculture?
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove FarmLogs filter FarmLogs
- Acxiom (1) Apply Acxiom filter
- American Farm Bureau (1) Apply American Farm Bureau filter
- BASF (1) Apply BASF filter
- Bayer (1) Apply Bayer filter
- California (1) Apply California filter
- Canada (1) Apply Canada filter
- ChemChina (1) Apply ChemChina filter
- Climate Corp. (1) Apply Climate Corp. filter
- Dow (1) Apply Dow filter
- DuPont (1) Apply DuPont filter
- European Commission (1) Apply European Commission filter
- Experian (1) Apply Experian filter
- Florida (1) Apply Florida filter
- General Motors (1) Apply General Motors filter
- Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition initiative (GODAN) (1) Apply Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition initiative (GODAN) filter
- Hawaii (1) Apply Hawaii filter
- ISOBlue (1) Apply ISOBlue filter
- Japan (1) Apply Japan filter
- John Deere (1) Apply John Deere filter
- Monsanto (1) Apply Monsanto filter
- Open Ag Data Alliance (1) Apply Open Ag Data Alliance filter
- OSGATA (1) Apply OSGATA filter
- Philippines (1) Apply Philippines filter
- Public Patent Foundation (1) Apply Public Patent Foundation filter
- Purdue University (1) Apply Purdue University filter
- Solutia Inc. (1) Apply Solutia Inc. filter
- South Korea (1) Apply South Korea filter
- Syngenta (1) Apply Syngenta filter
- Taiwan (1) Apply Taiwan filter
- Texas (1) Apply Texas filter
- United Kingdom (1) Apply United Kingdom filter
- United Nations (1) Apply United Nations filter
- US Department of Agriculture (USDA) (1) Apply US Department of Agriculture (USDA) filter
- US National Science Foundation (NSF) (1) Apply US National Science Foundation (NSF) filter
- US state of Mississippi (1) Apply US state of Mississippi filter
- Vietnam (1) Apply Vietnam filter
Scope
Stakeholder
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER