This paper examines data and privacy governance by four China-based mobile applications and their international versions - including the role of the state. It also highlights the role of platforms in gatekeeping mobile app privacy standards.
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove Baidu filter Baidu
- (-) Remove Google filter Google
- (-) Remove News Republic filter News Republic
- AirBNB (1) Apply AirBNB filter
- Alibaba (1) Apply Alibaba filter
- Amazon (1) Apply Amazon filter
- Apple (1) Apply Apple filter
- Baillie Gifford (1) Apply Baillie Gifford filter
- Beijing Cyberspace and Informatisation Office (1) Apply Beijing Cyberspace and Informatisation Office filter
- Brazil (1) Apply Brazil filter
- ByteDance (1) Apply ByteDance filter
- Canada (1) Apply Canada filter
- Canadian Apple App Store (1) Apply Canadian Apple App Store filter
- Canadian Google Play Store (1) Apply Canadian Google Play Store filter
- China (1) Apply China filter
- Chinese government (1) Apply Chinese government filter
- Cyber Administration of China (1) Apply Cyber Administration of China filter
- Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) (1) Apply Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) filter
- Dailyhunt (1) Apply Dailyhunt filter
- Douyin (1) Apply Douyin filter
- European Union (EU) (1) Apply European Union (EU) filter
- Evernote (1) Apply Evernote filter
- Facebook (1) Apply Facebook filter
- Flipagram (1) Apply Flipagram filter
- France (1) Apply France filter
- Google+ (1) Apply Google+ filter
- Hong Kong (1) Apply Hong Kong filter
- India (1) Apply India filter
- Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (1) Apply Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information Technology filter
- Japan (1) Apply Japan filter
- LinkedIn (1) Apply LinkedIn filter
- Microsoft (1) Apply Microsoft filter
- North America (1) Apply North America filter
- Ontario (1) Apply Ontario filter
- President Xi (1) Apply President Xi filter
- Sequoia Capital (1) Apply Sequoia Capital filter
- Snapchat (1) Apply Snapchat filter
- Softbank (1) Apply Softbank filter
- Southeast Asia (1) Apply Southeast Asia filter
- State Council Information Office (1) Apply State Council Information Office filter
- Sword Net Action (1) Apply Sword Net Action filter
- Tencent (1) Apply Tencent filter
- TikTok (1) Apply TikTok filter
- TopBuzz (1) Apply TopBuzz filter
- Toutiao (1) Apply Toutiao filter
- Twitter (1) Apply Twitter filter
- United States (1) Apply United States filter
- US Federal Trade Commission (1) Apply US Federal Trade Commission filter
- US Navy (1) Apply US Navy filter
- WeChat (1) Apply WeChat filter
- Weixin (1) Apply Weixin filter
- Yanhong Li (1) Apply Yanhong Li filter
- YouTube (1) Apply YouTube filter
Scope
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER