The 'Facebook online social experiment' has caused much controversy. Researchers Cornelius Puschmann and Engin Bozdag review the debate around research ethics and come to the conclusion that "benefits for science should be balanced with possible hazards that may be caused by experiments, rather than precluding that such benefits outweigh the gains
Narrow down on Keyword
Actors
- (-) Remove Google filter Google
- (-) Remove The Atlantic filter The Atlantic
- Amazon (1) Apply Amazon filter
- Association of Internet Researchers (1) Apply Association of Internet Researchers filter
- Facebook (1) Apply Facebook filter
- Forbes (1) Apply Forbes filter
- Microsoft (1) Apply Microsoft filter
- OkCupid (1) Apply OkCupid filter
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) (1) Apply Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) filter
- The Guardian (1) Apply The Guardian filter
- The Independent (1) Apply The Independent filter
- The New York Times (1) Apply The New York Times filter
- Venture Beat (1) Apply Venture Beat filter
- Yahoo (1) Apply Yahoo filter
Scope
Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.
Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in
- Research articles
- In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
- Concepts
- Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
- Editorials
- Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
- Essays
- Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
- News
- Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
- Opinions
- Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
- Open Abstract
- Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review
peer reviewed
not peer reviewed
Connect
Follow us @POLICYR
emailSubscribe NEWSLETTER