To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Van Calster, G., Gonzalez Arreaza, A., & Apers, E. (2018). Not just one, but many ‘Rights to be Forgotten’. Internet Policy Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2018.2.794

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Van Calster, Geert, Gonzalez Arreaza, Alejandro and Apers, Elsemiek. 2018. "Not just one, but many ‘Rights to be Forgotten’". Internet Policy Review 7 (2). DOI: 10.14763/2018.2.794. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/not-just-one-many-rights-be-forgotten.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Van Calster, Geert, Gonzalez Arreaza, A. & Apers, E. (2018). Not just one, but many ‘Rights to be Forgotten’. Internet Policy Review,[online] 7(2). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/not-just-one-many-rights-be-forgotten [Accessed: 23 Sep. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Van Calster, Geert, Gonzalez Arreaza, Alejandro, and Apers, Elsemiek. "Not just one, but many ‘Rights to be Forgotten’". Internet Policy Review 7.2 (2018). Web. 23 Sep. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Van Calster G, Gonzalez Arreaza A, Apers E. Not just one, but many ‘Rights to be Forgotten’. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2018 [23 September 2026];7(2). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/not-just-one-many-rights-be-forgotten

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

This piece examines the urgent need for a harmonised approach to balancing the rights to freedom of expression and information with the right to personal data protection under the EU legal system.

This is the second of a series of posts about the pending EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and its consequences for intermediaries and user speech online.

First of a series of posts about the pending EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and its consequences for intermediaries and user speech online.

This article examines the stance of the European Union vis-à-vis internet services company Google in two controversial instances: the ‘right to be forgotten’ and the implementation of EU competition rules.

KEYWORDS: Intermediary liability, Regulatory shifts, Digital monopoly, Right to be forgotten, E-commerce, Data protection, Taxation, Antitrust, Privacy

In the past 12 months privacy and data protection took a much more prominent role in internet policy discussions. One of the key examples is the so-called Google Spain case. Researcher Jef Ausloos revisits the case at the European privacy conference CPDP.

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issues on the topic of
Governing the metaverse through the lens of the public sphere

Big tech in global security governance

Additional indexing