To cite this page

APA

Malcolm, J. (2017). Contested meanings of inclusiveness, accountability and transparency in trade policymaking. Internet Policy Review, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2017.4.772

American Psychological Association. For more info, see http://www.apastyle.org/

Chicago

Malcolm, Jeremy. 2017. "Contested meanings of inclusiveness, accountability and transparency in trade policymaking". Internet Policy Review 6 (4). DOI: 10.14763/2017.4.772. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/contested-meanings-inclusiveness-accountability-and-transparency-trade.

For more info, see http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/

Harvard

Malcolm, J. (2017). Contested meanings of inclusiveness, accountability and transparency in trade policymaking. Internet Policy Review,[online] 6(4). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/contested-meanings-inclusiveness-accountability-and-transparency-trade [Accessed: 25 Apr. 2024].

MLA

Malcolm, Jeremy. "Contested meanings of inclusiveness, accountability and transparency in trade policymaking". Internet Policy Review 6.4 (2017). Web. 25 Apr. 2024.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/08/

Vancouver

Malcolm J. Contested meanings of inclusiveness, accountability and transparency in trade policymaking. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2017 [25 April 2024];6(4). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/contested-meanings-inclusiveness-accountability-and-transparency-trade

Vancouver Style. For more info, see http://library.vcc.ca/downloads/VCC_VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Dyslexia mode

Adjusts contrasts, text, and spacing in order to improve legibility for people with dyslexia.

Contrasts, text, and spacing are adjusted in order to improve legibility for people with dyslexia. Also, links look like this and italics like this. Font is changed to Atkinson Hyperlegible

Is this feature helpful for you, or could the design be improved? If you have feedback please send us a message.

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

in cooperation with

and additional partners

Additional indexing

Subscribe NEWSLETTER

Metrics

peer reviewed

not peer reviewed

Connect