To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

De Filippi, P. (2014). Bitcoin: a regulatory nightmare to a libertarian dream. Internet Policy Review, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2014.2.286

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

De Filippi, Primavera. 2014. "Bitcoin: a regulatory nightmare to a libertarian dream". Internet Policy Review 3 (2). DOI: 10.14763/2014.2.286. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/bitcoin-regulatory-nightmare-libertarian-dream.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

De Filippi, Primavera (2014). Bitcoin: a regulatory nightmare to a libertarian dream. Internet Policy Review,[online] 3(2). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/bitcoin-regulatory-nightmare-libertarian-dream [Accessed: 17 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

De Filippi, Primavera. "Bitcoin: a regulatory nightmare to a libertarian dream". Internet Policy Review 3.2 (2014). Web. 17 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

De Filippi P. Bitcoin: a regulatory nightmare to a libertarian dream. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2014 [17 August 2026];3(2). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/bitcoin-regulatory-nightmare-libertarian-dream

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

The UN has a new permanent home for cybersecurity diplomacy. Whether it can bridge the gap between agreed norms and actual state behaviour is the question that matters.

A cryptocurrency system can be understood as a system intended for the issuance of tokens which are intended to be used as a general or limited-purpose medium-of-exchange, and which are accounted for using an often collectively-maintained digital ledger making use of cryptography to replace trust in institutions to varying extents. Against such a backdrop, the singular term cryptocurrency can mean a token, intended to be used as a general or limited-purpose medium-of-exchange, issued via a cryptocurrency system.

KEYWORDS: Cryptocurrency, Bitcoin

Cryptoeconomics describes an interdisciplinary, emergent and experimental field that draws on ideas and concepts from economics, game theory and related disciplines in the design of peer-to-peer cryptographic systems.

KEYWORDS: Cryptocurrency, Economics

Is Bitcoin a fair and reliable currency? Contrary to what its proponents might hope, Bitcoin is far from fulfilling their expectations.

KEYWORDS: Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, Social justice, Efficiency, Libertarianism

Contrary to the early view that cryptocurrencies’ decentralisation makes them unregulable, the formation of new intermediaries will guarantee regulators’ ultimate power. The key challenge is how to balance control and innovation.

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing