To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Joergensen, R.F. (2014). Can human rights law bend mass surveillance? Internet Policy Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2014.1.249

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Joergensen, Rikke Frank. 2014. "Can human rights law bend mass surveillance?". Internet Policy Review 3 (1). DOI: 10.14763/2014.1.249. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/can-human-rights-law-bend-mass-surveillance.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Joergensen, Rikke Frank (2014). Can human rights law bend mass surveillance? Internet Policy Review,[online] 3(1). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/can-human-rights-law-bend-mass-surveillance [Accessed: 3 Nov. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Joergensen, Rikke Frank. "Can human rights law bend mass surveillance?". Internet Policy Review 3.1 (2014). Web. 3 Nov. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Joergensen RF. Can human rights law bend mass surveillance? Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2014 [3 November 2026];3(1). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/can-human-rights-law-bend-mass-surveillance

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

Baby-tracking apps promise to help parents, this reveals how baby-tracking apps transform intimate caregiving into a site of cross-border data extraction, profiling, and policy non-compliance.

KEYWORDS: Baby-tracking applications, Platform infrastructures, Datafication, Data sovereignty, Privacy

The clash between law power and code power in the controversy over Meta’s “pay or okay model”.

KEYWORDS: Platform power, Internet regulation, Surveillance advertising, Privacy, Marketing

This article demonstrates the need for much more than a “computing plus” approach to truly realise the potential of interdisciplinary cybersecurity and privacy research.

KEYWORDS: Security, Privacy, Interdisciplinarity, Collaboration, Research

By opening the craft of interdisciplinary method to more explicit scrutiny, this special issue provides a novel space to examine how knowledge in the domains of cybersecurity, privacy, and digital rights governance is made, contested, and reshaped.

KEYWORDS: Interdisciplinarity, Interdisciplinary methods, Cybersecurity, Privacy, Digital rights

The struggles of African professionals shut out of LinkedIn reveal how digital identity systems, if poorly designed, can erode rights and opportunities anywhere, even in Europe.

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Call for papers

Monetisation governance in the creator economy

Read the full call here

Additional indexing