To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Beytía, P., & Wagner, C. (2022). Visibility layers: a framework for systematising the gender gap in Wikipedia content. Internet Policy Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.1.1621

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Beytía, Pablo and Wagner, Claudia. 2022. "Visibility layers: a framework for systematising the gender gap in Wikipedia content". Internet Policy Review 11 (1). DOI: 10.14763/2022.1.1621. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/visibility-layers-framework-systematising-gender-gap-wikipedia-content.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Beytía, Pablo & Wagner, C. (2022). Visibility layers: a framework for systematising the gender gap in Wikipedia content. Internet Policy Review,[online] 11(1). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/visibility-layers-framework-systematising-gender-gap-wikipedia-content [Accessed: 20 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Beytía, Pablo, and Wagner, Claudia. "Visibility layers: a framework for systematising the gender gap in Wikipedia content". Internet Policy Review 11.1 (2022). Web. 20 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Beytía P, Wagner C. Visibility layers: a framework for systematising the gender gap in Wikipedia content. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2022 [20 August 2026];11(1). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/visibility-layers-framework-systematising-gender-gap-wikipedia-content

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

This study examines the Lunch Bell project, a state-supported, women-centred meal delivery platform in Kerala, India, embodying a digital solidarity economy that promotes sustainability and addresses gender inequalities through its inclusive labour model.

KEYWORDS: Digital solidarity economies, Women's labour, State, gender, Platform design

According to recent studies, Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) output discriminates against women. On testing ChatGPT, terms such as “expert” and “integrity” were used to describe men, while women were associated with “beauty” or “delight”. This was the case while using the Large Language Model, Alpaca, a model developed by Stanford University to produce recommendation letters for potential employees.

Gender inequalities in digital labour platforms echo those in the traditional labour market.

KEYWORDS: Digital labour platforms, gender, Crowdworking, Inequality, Labour, Standards

This paper considers the logic of ‘platform care’ as a continuation of historically invisibilised reproductive labour.

KEYWORDS: gender, Digital platforms, Biopolitics, Infrastructure, Labour, Private sector

This study applies a “doing gender” perspective and intersectionality theory to examine the gendered access to the European sharing economy.

KEYWORDS: Sharing economy, Digital inequality, Intersectionality, gender, Habitus

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing