To cite this page | Internet Policy Review

APA

Tusikov, N. (2019). Regulation through “bricking”: private ordering in the “Internet of Things”. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1405

American Psychological Association. For more info, see https://www.apastyle.org

Chicago

Tusikov, Natasha. 2019. "Regulation through “bricking”: private ordering in the “Internet of Things”". Internet Policy Review 8 (2). DOI: 10.14763/2019.2.1405. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/regulation-through-bricking-private-ordering-internet-things.

Chicago Referencing Style. For more info, see https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

Harvard

Tusikov, Natasha (2019). Regulation through “bricking”: private ordering in the “Internet of Things”. Internet Policy Review,[online] 8(2). Available at: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/regulation-through-bricking-private-ordering-internet-things [Accessed: 18 Aug. 2026].

Harvard Referencing Style

MLA

Tusikov, Natasha. "Regulation through “bricking”: private ordering in the “Internet of Things”". Internet Policy Review 8.2 (2019). Web. 18 Aug. 2026.

Modern Language Association, 7th Ed. For more info, see https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/index.html

Vancouver

Tusikov N. Regulation through “bricking”: private ordering in the “Internet of Things”. Internet Policy Review [Internet]. 2019 [18 August 2026];8(2). Available from: https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/regulation-through-bricking-private-ordering-internet-things

Vancouver Style. For more info, see https://library.vcc.ca/media/vcc-library/content-assets/documents/VancouverStyleGuide.pdf

This article critically interrogates the increasing importance of connectivity protocols for how they shape and prefigure dynamics of platform power, as dominant actors in the tech sector collaborate on the issue of smart home and Internet of Things interoperability in efforts to maintain their market power and demonstrate their ability to regulate themselves.

KEYWORDS: Interoperability, Protocols, Internet of things, Self-regulation, Matter

The rapid development of the Internet of Things - or IoT - affects the protection of privacy in profound ways. Eduardo Magrani argues in favour of a shift from privacy protection to the idea a “right to non-tracking”.

Volume 6, Issue 1

Towards responsive regulation of the Internet of Things: Australian perspectives

Megan Richardson, The University of Melbourne
Rachelle Bosua, The University of Melbourne
Karin Clark, The University of Melbourne
Jeb Webb, The University of Melbourne
Atif Ahmad, The University of Melbourne
Sean Maynard, The University of Melbourne
PUBLISHED ON: 14 Mar 2017 DOI: 10.14763/2017.1.455

This paper is part of Australian internet policy, a special issue of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Angela Daly and Julian Thomas. Acknowledgement: Thanks to the Melbourne Networked Society Institute at the University of Melbourne for funding our research project ‘The Internet of Things (IoT) and Consumer Privacy’, 2015-2016, and to our participants for generously sharing their experiences and concerns about the IoT. Some of the information and ideas in this article draw on Richardson et al., 2016. Introduction Collaboration, networking and innovation are predicted to change radically as we move into an era of the Internet of Things (IoT). One of the fastest-growing trends in …

KEYWORDS: Internet of things, Innovation

In this article the 'Internet of Things' is considered to be a new, powerful governance factor challenging regulation by law described as the ‘Governance by Things’.

KEYWORDS: Governance by Things, Internet of things, Regulation, Private ordering

What does politics have to take into account when ever more objects are connect to the internet? EU experts publish their report on the “internet of things”.

Internet Policy Review is an open access and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

Scholars, regulators, journalists, activists, and other stakeholders publish in the journal in a variety of formats

Research articles: In-depth scholarly research papers and essays
Concepts: Critical reflections on emerging core concepts of the digital society
Editorials: Contextual or thematic introductions to special issues
Essays: Free-form yet in-depth contentions with issues of academic or social relevance
News: Journalistic reports on events of interest to the Internet Policy Review community
Opinions: Opinion pieces commenting on developments in the realm of internet policy
Open Abstract: Extended abstracts for works in progress that receive public peer review

Published by

Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Center for Advanced Internet Studies in cooperation with additional partners

Special issue on the topic of
Inclusive by design? Participatory governance and the future of digital public spaces

Full call here

Additional indexing