Disinformation

Hybrid institutions for disinformation governance: Between imaginative and imaginary

Martin Fertmann, Leibniz-Institute for Media Research/Hans-Bredow-Institut
Bharath Ganesh, University of Groningen
Robert Gorwa, Berlin Social Science Center (WZB)
Lisa-Maria Neudert, University of Oxford
PUBLISHED ON: 16 May 2022

This opinion piece is part of a 3-part miniseries advancing key reflections in disinformation governance. This article discusses the potential of new institutions for disinformation governance.

Disinformation

Truth, intention and harm: Conceptual challenges for disinformation-targeted governance

Naomi Appelman, University of Amsterdam
Stephan Dreyer, Leibniz-Institute for Media Research/Hans-Bredow-Institut
Pranav Manjesh Bidare, Stanford University
Keno C. Potthast, Leibniz-Institute for Media Research/Hans-Bredow-Institut
PUBLISHED ON: 16 May 2022

This opinion piece is part of a 3-part miniseries advancing key reflections in disinformation governance. This article discusses conceptual challenges for disinformation governance.

Encryption

How message tracing regulations subvert encryption

Divyank Katira, Centre for Internet and Society (CIS)
Gurshabad Grover, Centre for Internet and Society (CIS)
PUBLISHED ON: 24 Mar 2022

In 2021, a message tracing regulation came into effect in India. This leaves the private communications of half a billion users of such services vulnerable to novel forms of abuse. The authors discuss the relevance to jurisdictions worldwide currently mulling over encryption regulation.

Pages